It started when he'd run out of venom to spit at the gunfacts file, having adressed approximately half a percent of it.
Only days after I blogged about the current state of the UK, he released his own post.
Both of the articles we cite use the very sane study, his just uses a different way of processing data.
Which one is right?
Well, he's got two lines of comment, me, I have a couple of lengthy posts, dealing with the terrible situation in the country, a comprehensive post on how Londeners aren't any safer, a little refresher of how many children got killed in 2007, as well as a myriad of other articles about the UK.
Having refused to allow my follow-up response, guy has now shifted to calling people racists, as can be seen in the edited author of the last reply in his post "Comment by FeroVeritas-Certified Racist — February 6, 2008 @ 4:15 pm"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Responding to jade is like beating your head against a brick wall it feels good when you stop.
I'm sure he will have a hay day with the Missouri shooting
I think that you look at various data (kudos to you for finding it) in a pretty objective way. Maybe that is because I agree with you. In any case keep on doing what you do and don't let the trolls get ya down.
Let's get one thing straight: I don't agree with anybody or any ideology, I only seek to increase the safety of the general public.
If the facts were to change and there would really be empirical evidence calling for the ban of guns, I would turn my song faster than a top can spin.
Right now, guns are saving lives (or better: gun control isn't) so I side with the pro-gun crowd. That is what makes me tick, nothing more than that.
I am a critic of both sides, and will remain such untill it is put to a rest.
Post a Comment